Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Juliar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is self-promotional and violates WP:N, WP:V, and WP:RS. All links are to the creators site, the article contains uncited claims of original research, and article touts benefits that are obvious nonsense to anyone with a passing familiarity with the subject matter (programming languages):

The language compiler got a speed boost due to the Pascal's Triangle Theory Computer Optimization Algorithm written by Andrey Mikhailovich Makhanov. Currently, the language has been shown to compile and run a program with 0n^2 complexity faster than native C and C++ when compiled and ran from source.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.223.221.219 (talk) 16:18, 21 April 2016‎ (UTC) Created for IP using rationale from article talk page by -- GB fan 16:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although perhaps we should preserve this one outside of mainspace somewhere, so we can show people what would happen if we would stop enforcing GNG for articles about programming languages. —Ruud 08:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none of this suggests better for the applicable software notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The original call for deletion lists several good reason why this page should be removed. Not the least of which it is currently seems more like an advertisement or way to pull views to their own site without citing any other sources to back up their claims, which are indeed nonsense to anyone familiar computer programming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6001:F04D:5F00:26FD:52FF:FE65:390A (talk) 07:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.